Howdy folks. Today will be looking at a chat room log some of my classmates did for an in class discussion on authorship and identity. It was a lively discussion, but it also fell prey to the one weakness of chat rooms. This weakness is that many people jump from idea to idea rapidly during the conversation, thus it makes it hard to follow any one train of thought for more then a few lines. On the other hand, I was able to study these several trains of thought, to gain a greater understanding of each aspect of the conversation. Mixed in with the revelations of the group are my own comments and thoughts.
The reoccuring idea in the chat is what is authorship and what qualifies someone to authorship of something. The word itself is defined (according to Websters) as “the state or act of creating or causing.” Authorships on the Internet is often fuzzy. Many times, people post information that is not their’s, without citing the proper sources. Other times, someone posts an idea as their own, but it has been thought of by someone else some time before them. In either of these cases, the offender is usually accused of plagiarism. If such a thing is true, one chatter stated she would have to cite everything she wrote or said. This brings up the question of whether or not plagiarism is automatic or most be commited with full knowledge of taking someone else’s ideas for their own. Older schools of thought would answer that plagiarism is the former, but in such rapidly evolving times, this meaning is being challenged increasingly. Many people now espouse information sharing, which is the free use of ideas without a restrictive system of citation. Under this system, the spread of ideas is more important then the authorship of an idea.
The grouop then touches in the Napster article, which brings the topic of sharing information. Napster and other file sharing programs are considered illegal because their users are trading music and video for free. Publishing companies are cut out when people share files online and do not get the profits they would from people purchasing that music. The group discusses how the only people truly losing out with file sharing programs are the people at the publishing company. If artists want, they could release their works online for a small amount of money. Surely, some people would still download them for free, but I think such a thing would motivate fans to buy their artists’ music because doing such would support them more directly. This practice to me, seems like it would be closer to the spirit of authorship then what the publishing companies espouse it to be.
All in all, the subject of authorship and information sharing is an interesting one, but a topic that must be given more than a single blog post or 40 minutes of in game chat time. I would suggest taking this basic information and discussing the topic of authorship with your own friends. The importance of this topic (like the Internet itself) is growing daily and its good to be prepared for the future of information and technology.
PS: The hot water is fixed!